<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1649: Charles I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1623: Amboyna Massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-16180</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1623: Amboyna Massacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-16180</guid>
		<description>[...] against the perpetrators continued to complicate Dutch-English relations into the reign of Charles I and beyond. Even Oliver Cromwell required, as the price of peace for the First Anglo-Dutch War in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] against the perpetrators continued to complicate Dutch-English relations into the reign of Charles I and beyond. Even Oliver Cromwell required, as the price of peace for the First Anglo-Dutch War in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1554: Lady Jane Grey, the Nine Days&#8217; Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-15565</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1554: Lady Jane Grey, the Nine Days&#8217; Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-15565</guid>
		<description>[...] forever a separate kingdom and nation. Without a King James of England, there would not have been a Charles I of England, and thus perhaps no religious civil wars in the mid 17th century. Carried still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forever a separate kingdom and nation. Without a King James of England, there would not have been a Charles I of England, and thus perhaps no religious civil wars in the mid 17th century. Carried still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1661: Thomas Venner and the Fifth Monarchy Men</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-13610</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1661: Thomas Venner and the Fifth Monarchy Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-13610</guid>
		<description>[...] Venner himself was born in New England, and there&#8217;s a zippy bio of him in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. The North American colonies and Parliamentarian Britain helped to incubate political/religious heterodoxy for one another, and Venner was not the only budding religious zealot in the distant marches to emigrate to London after Charles I lost his head. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Venner himself was born in New England, and there&#8217;s a zippy bio of him in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. The North American colonies and Parliamentarian Britain helped to incubate political/religious heterodoxy for one another, and Venner was not the only budding religious zealot in the distant marches to emigrate to London after Charles I lost his head. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; Themed Set: Resistance and Rebellion in the Restoration</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-13473</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; Themed Set: Resistance and Rebellion in the Restoration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-13473</guid>
		<description>[...] Stuart line was (for now) restored to the throne, and the regicides of its late king horribly if not voluminously [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stuart line was (for now) restored to the throne, and the regicides of its late king horribly if not voluminously [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1645: William Laud, given to the devil</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12846</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1645: William Laud, given to the devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12846</guid>
		<description>[...] run as Archbishop of Canterbury also happened to coincide with Charles I&#8217;s 11-year personal rule, sans parliament. The overweening divine&#8217;s influence on secular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] run as Archbishop of Canterbury also happened to coincide with Charles I&#8217;s 11-year personal rule, sans parliament. The overweening divine&#8217;s influence on secular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; Daily Double: John Hothams</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; Daily Double: John Hothams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>[...] of its sizable arsenal. And though the elder Hotham personally barred the gates of Hull against King Charles &#8212; Hotham had been appointed governor by Parliament in a test of authority against the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of its sizable arsenal. And though the elder Hotham personally barred the gates of Hull against King Charles &#8212; Hotham had been appointed governor by Parliament in a test of authority against the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1624: Marco Antonio de Dominis, posthumously</title>
		<link>http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>ExecutedToday.com &#187; 1624: Marco Antonio de Dominis, posthumously</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/01/30/1649-charles-i/#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>[...] vituperator had, too, become complicated by the progress of the proposed Spanish Match to wed Prince Charles to Europe&#8217;s leading Catholic monarchy &#8212; an ultimately abortive project, but nearing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vituperator had, too, become complicated by the progress of the proposed Spanish Match to wed Prince Charles to Europe&#8217;s leading Catholic monarchy &#8212; an ultimately abortive project, but nearing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
