Comments on: 2003: Nobody in Illinois

By: Dudley Sharp

Dudley Sharp — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:46:46 +0000

To: Dahn Shaulis, aka Vegas Quixote or vegasquixote or theamericaninjusticesystem or Jon Sheldon

I don’t know what court to speak of because you haven’t identified the statutes/laws that were broken.

SCOTUS is not a trial court, so, no, even in the US, I would be speaking of a trial court.

Have you identified the laws brokne, yet?

By: Dudley Sharp

Dudley Sharp — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:49:10 +0000

ET:

9-10 death row inmates have been released from death row because of DNA exclusion.

herrera v Collins is key to what?

By: ExecutedToday.com » 1993: Leonel Herrera, perilously close to simple murder?

Tue, 12 May 2009 19:46:11 +0000

[...] as DNA evidence and other forensic advances in the intervening years have increasingly eroded confidence in the reliability of the justice system that metes out death, Herrera v. Collins stands as a key [...]

By: vegasquixote

vegasquixote — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:59:29 +0000

Are you talking about the same US Supreme Court that gave Bush the 2000 rigged election? The Supreme Court that ignored the thousands of people who were disenfranchised in Florida? Or are you talking about the US Supreme Court that says torture is ok?

By: Dudley Sharp

Dudley Sharp — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:47 +0000

To: Dahn Shaulis, aka Vegas Quixote or vegasquixote or theamericaninjusticesystem

You need to be detailed about the statutes, the alleged crimes per those ststutes and the punishments for them, as stated, earlier.

I didn’t say anything about the locations, as per your US reference. So, you should really attempt to be specific to the laws anywhere.

Here is a recent ruling on wiretapping. So, you may be in error with everything else, as well. Try to be specific, otherwise it is just rhetoric.

http://www.charleston.net/news/2009/jan/26/a_legitimate_limit_privacy69528/

By: vegasquixote

vegasquixote — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:22:25 +0000

I suppose, Mr. Dudley Sharp, that initiating an unnecessary war that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands is not a crime in the US. Nor is promoting torture a crime in the US. Nor is wiretapping a crime in the US. Isn’t it great when an anti-social President can make and interpret the laws however he wishes?

By: Dudley Sharp

Dudley Sharp — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:24:59 +0000

To: Dahn Shaulis, aka Vegas Quixote or vegasquixote

The place to start is, you must

identify the specific alleged crimes, the speific laws that were allegedly broken, as well as the sanctions that are available for those crimes within those specific statutes.

That would be some good research for you to do, as it is your question.

After you do all of that, come back and present it so that we can all take a look at what you have found.

That’s the only responsible way for you to procede, meaning, you well may not do it. but, give it a go.