2003: Richard Edwin Fox, bogus job interviewer 1530: Tangaxuan II, the last Tarasco ruler

1542: Kathryn Howard, the rose without a thorn

February 13th, 2009 Lara Eakins

(Thanks to Lara Eakins of the TudorHistory.org Blog for the guest post. -ed.)

On this date in 1542, Henry VIII’s fifth queen, Kathryn Howard, was beheaded in the Tower of London for high treason. She was the second of Henry’s queens to face this fate, the other being Kathryn’s first cousin Anne Boleyn.

This Hans Holbein miniature is generally thought to be Kathryn Howard, though the identification is uncertain. From the TudorHistory.org blog Kathryn Howard gallery.

Kathryn Howard* was born sometime between 1518 and 1524 to Lord Edmund Howard (a younger brother of Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk) and his wife Joyce Culpepper. Joyce died while Kathryn was young and her father took a post in Calais, leaving Kathryn in the charge of her step-grandmother, Agnes Tilney the Dowager Duchess of Norfolk. The Duchess oversaw Kathryn’s education, but apparently didn’t keep as close an eye on other aspects of the girl’s life.

Kathryn’s first physical relationship that we know of occurred in around 1536 with her music teacher Henry Manox. In her later confession she told of “the fair and flattering persuasions of Mannock, being but a young girl, suffered him at sundry times to handle and touch the secret parts of my body…”. In late 1538, Kathryn began a sexual relationship with Francis Dereham, which was to become part of her downfall as Queen.

The next year, 1539, Kathryn took a position at court, becoming a maid of honor for Henry’s soon-to-be fourth Queen, Anne of Cleves. The Dowager Duchess of Norfolk later recalled that Henry first took notice of Kathryn at Greenwich in December of 1539 during the preparations for Anne’s arrival. Henry was famously disappointed by his new foreign bride and by early July 1540 the marriage was annulled. During the short marriage to Anne of Cleves, Henry had already begun to send gifts to Kathryn and took her as his fifth Queen on July 28th at Oatlands Palace.

Henry was 49 years old and Kathryn was no older than 22 (and more likely around 19). For all that can be said against this match, the vivacious young girl brought back some of Henry’s zest for life. The King lavished gifts on his young wife and called her his ‘rose without a thorn’ and the ‘very jewel of womanhood’.

Thomas Culpepper, a distant relation of Kathryn’s through her mother, sought favor from the Queen in early 1541 which was probably when their secret meetings began. Their rendezvous were aided by Kathryn’s lady of the privy chamber, Jane Boleyn, sister-in-law to the late Queen Anne Boleyn through Jane’s marriage to Anne’s brother George.** Also at this time, Francis Dereham returned to England from Ireland and gained a position in Kathryn’s household, possibly arranged to keep his silence about their earlier relationship.

During the summer of 1541, Henry and his young queen went on progress to the north of England and returned to Hampton Court on October 29. Just a few days later everything would begin to unravel. On November 2, Archbishop Cranmer sent a letter to the King telling him of his wife’s previous lovers. Henry seemed reluctant to believe the charges at first, but upon the questioning of Dereham and Manox –- who confirmed the allegations –- Henry left Kathryn at Hampton Court and returned to London. He never saw her again.

During the interrogations of the men, Francis Dereham said that Thomas Culpepper had replaced him in the Queen’s affections. Kathryn was presented with these new allegations and admitted to secret meetings with Culpepper (as well as the relationships with Manox and Dereham before her marriage), but denied that a sexual relationship had existed between them. Culpepper was imprisoned in the Tower of London and Kathryn was moved to the former abbey at Syon and deprived of her queenship.

Dereham and Culpepper were found guilty of treason on December 1 and were executed on December 10. Dereham was hanged, disemboweled, beheaded and quartered at Tyburn. Culpepper fared better, owing to his status, and was only beheaded. The former queen and her lady Jane Boleyn never faced a trial for their actions but instead had acts of attainder passed against them. On February 10, 1542, the ladies entered the Tower of London to await their executions.

Kathryn was told on the 12th that her execution would be the next morning and according to Imperial Ambassador Chapuys, she rehearsed the execution for several hours and even requested that the block be brought to her so she would know how to place her head. A merchant named Ottwell Johnson was an eyewitness to the execution on the morning of the 13th and wrote in a letter to his brother that Kathryn and Jane both “made the most godly and Christian end” and that Kathryn, in her scaffold speech, said that her punishment was worthy and just. (The letter is among period correspondence printed in this public-domain book.)

Kathryn’s head was struck from her body with one stoke of the axe, as was Jane’s, a merciful outcome compared to other ladies who shared their fate, such as Margaret Pole and Mary Queen of Scots. Kathryn and Jane were both quickly buried in the Chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula in the Tower precincts, joining Henry’s other beheaded queen, Anne Boleyn and Jane’s husband, George.

* Or Catherine Howard, or Katherine Howard, or Katheryn Howard. Spelling at the time, even of proper names, was fluid.

** Jane Boleyn, Lady Rochford, is popularly supposed to have supplied the explosive incest allegation against her husband, George Boleyn, and his sister Anne Boleyn. Being subsequently hoisted on her own petard in the game of courtly purging, she tends to get short shrift in the sympathy department — though the fact is that we really don’t know much about her.

On this day..

Entry Filed under: 16th Century,20th Century,Beheaded,Capital Punishment,Death Penalty,England,Execution,Famous,Guest Writers,Hanged,History,Murder,Nobility,Other Voices,Power,Royalty,Sex,Treason,Women

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

18 thoughts on “1542: Kathryn Howard, the rose without a thorn”

  1. Student says:

    who is the publisher of this site

  2. Lisa says:

    Also a huge fan of Tudor history and especially the cousins Anne and Catherine (or however one chooses to spell it) …

    Also interested to see the portrait used … MORE likely to be Kathryn that the one that for such a long time had been assumed to be her but is now believed to be Jane Seymour’s sister Elizabeth.

    While it’s true that so much is unknown, a great novel (with liberties taken, perhaps, but likely closer to accuracy than, say, “The Other Boleyn Sister”) is Jean Plaidy’s “Murder Most Royal.” While she wrote novels about Anne and Catherine separately, this one is the best, IMHO, because it ties together their stories and relationship.

  3. jherdah says:

    very scandalous queen of king henry Viii catherine howard
    tindi mu girl

  4. Tudorrose says:

    I have never heard of this book.Must try and get it though.sounds interesting something I would like to get my hands on!
    Since I have been into the Tudor period since the age of eleven.

  5. ravensdottir says:

    For those enthralled with Tudor history, try to find a book called Queen Elizabeth’s Wardrobe Unlock’d – preferably from the library, unless you want to spend $150USD on it. It covers the last inventory of her clothing as a starting point. It also covers where her clothes came from, right down to the sources for raw materials. And these is a final note comparing Elizabeth’s clothing expenditures vs. James I – absolutely fascinating to learn how frugal she really was. Most of the dresses were mix-&-match- sleeves, bodice, skirts, & under-skirts all separate & often re-worked to save money.

  6. Fiz (UK) says:

    Yes, it was part of my university history course and I read everything I can get my hands on about the Tudors. Have you read the new Henry VIII, Virtuous Prince, by David Starkey? Don’t buy the exhibition book, unless you want it, because a lot of unscrupulous websites are trying to make it look as if this is part of Prof, Starkey’s next book about Henry and it isn’t ,it’s purely about the the London exhibition, marking the 500th anniversary of his reign. One thing – it’s a fascinating peroid, but I’m glad I din’t live then!

  7. Tudorrose says:

    Im glad to hear that.Are you interested in Tudor history?Like me?

  8. Fiz (UK) says:

    I do know this, thank you.

  9. Tudorrose says:

    The Howards.that being her uncle Thomas Howard the duke of Norfolk wanted Catherine to marry the king.So it would give her or mainly her familly security.but the dream didn’t last due to Catherine’s behavior.She deffinately revelled in her marriage to the king.she enjoyed being flattered and pampered by Henry.But at the same time she enjoyed the company of men her own age.I think she wanted the security and weath from the king but love from a man her own age.This was no match for Catherine.Her relatives were just thinking about familly security and also restoring england’s catholic faith.

  10. Fiz (UK) says:

    I feel so sorry for Catherine Howard – such a pretty giddy little thing. It was no wonder she was caught out – she wasn’t clever like her cousin Anne, and just look what happened to her. I think Catherine was guilty as charged, but Henry was a disgusting, lecherous old goat who married her, probably against her will, to the greater glory of the House of Howard. They never did learn – Anne, Catherine and Frances Howard, who poisoned Sir Thomas Overbury, to stop him preventing her marriage to Sir Robert Carr.

  11. Tudorrose says:

    Catherine Howard is one of my favourite characters in Tudor History.It is a shame what happened to her but she didn’t deserve to be executed.There is only evidence for her past romances before she met the king.There is nothing to indicate that theese relationships were still continuing when she met and married the king.She appointed one Francis Dereham her Secratary.This was her downfall.Now the people of the court especially the ones that came over with her from Horsham and Lambeth would have no doubt thought that there was still something going on between Catherine and Dereham.Catherine met Culpepper who had been a page to the king for some time and she soon turned her attentions towards him.There is the Culpepper letter dated 1541 when Catherine tells him that she cant wait to see him and be with him.But as far as I am aware this relationship was platonic.Nothing went any further.So did she commit adultery or not?noone really knows.But she did have secret meetings with Thomas where they would meet and stay up to the early hours of the morning.My feelings are neutral in this case.I would say that it is a possibility.I would beleive the story that was brought out more over Catherine than her cousin Anne Boleyn.I definately don’t think Anne was guilty for the allegations that were brought against her.But cas for Catherine Maybe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Calendar

February 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  

Archives

Categories

Execution Playing Cards

Exclusively available on this site: our one-of-a-kind custom playing card deck.

Every card features a historical execution from England, France, Germany, or Russia!


Recent Comments

  • Kevin M. Sullivan: Hi RD, First, thanks for the good words about my Bundy books. I always put my heart and soul into...
  • RD: Kevin, I have enjoyed all of your work. The Bundy case became very stale over the years until you injected new...
  • XK: I do accept as true with all of the ideas you’ve offered for your post. They’re really convincing and...
  • vay tin chap lai suat thap: Awsome post and straight to the point. I don’t know if this is truly the best place...
  • markb: Howdy everybody: i received Al Carlisle’s new book a few days ago: Violent Mind – the1976...