On this date in 1888, “Prado” — also known as “Count Linska de Castillon”; he never copped to his real identity — was beheaded as a thief and murderer at Paris.
The trial of this intrepid criminal promised, in the London Times‘ Nov. 6, 1888 preview, to be “one of the most extraordinary of our times”
He [Prado] is a Spaniard, and was brought up at Gijon, but he refused to say who he was. When 14 years of age he visited Mozambique, India, China, California, the West Indies, and North America. In 1872 he was a sub-lieutenant in the Carlist bands. He then lived by his wits. He once crossed the French frontier and stole 8,000f. At the battle of Somorrostro he was wounded by a shell, and removed to a hospital, from which he enticed the sister of the Order of Saint Vincent de Paul who nursed him. She belonged to one of the first families in England. He married her, and with her visited the Holy Land, but her health failed, and she died on their return to Italy. Prado says he married a second wife at Lima, with a dowry of 1,200,000f., and that after her death he committed many daring robberies.
He’s the most interesting man in the world.
This vagabond upon the overgrown lost highways of fortune eventually ditched wife #2 in penury in Spain and proceeded to France where he mooched off a local girl and her absentee American sugar daddy, until one night he slashed the throat a dame named Marie Aguetant, the lover of a late-working croupier, and plundered their domicile of chattels.
Prado eluded capture for some time, keeping his lover, taking another — both of whom ended up in the dock with their insolent Don Juan, along with various male intimates in various aspects of accesorizing. None of those others drew a death sentence, but as the interest of the London Times suggests — it fronted near-daily trial dispatches from Paris — all this stuff about cabals of swarthy men ravishing women of their virtue and their valuables made global news.
It also moved Third Republic bodice-ripping true crime like this zippy little volume, “Prado ou Le Tueur de Filles,” with a copyright notice as late as 1931.

A savage crime by a strange character, but now that it’s long departed all living memory, it scarcely stands out. Legion are the lotharios who have slain for the pedestrian motivation of gold.
In a post-bourgeois order, “we will no longer see men like Pranzini, Prado, Berland, Anastay and others who kill in order to have this metal,” the French terrorist Ravachol‘s suppressed address to the courtroom declared in 1892. “The cause of all crimes is always the same, and you have to be foolish not to see this.”
Yes, I repeat it: it is society that makes criminals and you, jury members, instead of striking you should use your intelligence and your strength to transform society. In one fell swoop you’ll suppress all crime. And your work, in attacking causes, will be greater and more fruitful than your justice, which belittles itself in punishing its effects.
-Ravachol
Just a few days before this headline-grabbing execution, impressionist painter Vincent van Gogh undertook the most famous thing he ever did off-canvas: after his latest dispute with roommate and fellow-artist Paul Gauguin, van Gogh sliced off his own left earlobe.*
It was in this abnormal circumstance that Gauguin, fresh to Paris fleeing from the scene of the self-mutilation in Arles, attended Prado’s beheading, even forcing his way through a line of gendarmes to obtain a closer view.
“[H]e may have had the counterphobic desire to reassure himself of his courage by taking an unflinching look at Prado’s execution,” writes Bradley Collins. “Gauguin may have identified with both the executioner and his victim. On the one hand, by watching the state kill a man, he could vicariously release some of his pent-up aggression toward Vincent. On the other, by identifying with Prado he could vicariously atone for the guilt he felt about precipitating Vincent’s breakdown and abandoning [Arles].”
Aptly for Gauguin’s personal demons, the guillotine managed to botch this job, too — giving Prado a non-fatal facial injury and requiring the now-wounded condemned to be repositioned for another chop.
All this pate-slashing sure seems to have found its way into Gauguin’s next creation:

Gauguin’s grotesque “Jug in the form of a Head, Self-Portrait”. “Within one work, he has become both the bloody, earless Vincent [Van Gogh] and the guillotined Prado.” –Collins
* Latter-day revisionist hypothesis: Gauguin actually cut off van Gogh’s ear in a fight, but both painters kept to a cover story to keep everyone out of trouble. That version would only thicken the psychological stew for Gauguin’s pilgrimage to the guillotine and subsequent “self-portrait”.
On this day..
- 1866: John Roberson
- 1763: John Brannon, Joseph Jervis, Charles Riley, and Mary Robinson
- 1888: Leong Sing
- 2006: Qiu Xinghua, temple fury
- 1905: A.I. Volioshnikov, police spy
- 1022: Medieval Europe's first heresy executions
- 1868: Priscilla Biggadike, exonerated Stickney murderess
- 2010: Two Iranian political prisoners
- c. 560 B.C.E.: Aesop, fabulist
- 1894: Chief Two Sticks, Ghost Dancer
- 1827: Levi Kelley
Most interesting article. Especially concerning the putative misadventure of the guillotine. This site is the only one to state that Prado received a starter before being repositioned for the main course.
Incidentally, Marie Aguetant, the woman whom Prado killed, was previously the lover of a callow Oscar Wilde who adored her. Wilde was much distressed upon the news of Miss. Aguetant’s demise.
Weirdly, the youngest son of Oscar, Vyvyan Holland (surname changed to avoid notoriety) married Violet Craigie, the niece of the ‘Parisian grande dame who indirectly was the cause of Prado’s final arrest’ in January 1914. Sadly, Mrs. Holland died from injuries sustained in a fire in October 1914, there being no issue from the marriage.
Prado’s execution was not botched, but went just fine.
http://guillotine.voila.net/Palmares1871_1977.html
Let me know if you find one! I looked myself and couldn’t … maybe it’s too macabre for mass consumption, but this here site’s traffic says there’s a market for that sort of artifact.
Excellent. Great. Compelling.
That one is a great way to finish off the year 2010 on ET.
Never heard of Prado, but he is truly one of those “footnote people in history”. A person who has worldwide notoriety in their life, but now largely forgotten.
Jason, you even got me with a bit of word play. I was thinking “What’s he talking about, Gauguin wasn’t executed”!? Executed in the presence of Gauguin, not prior to Gauguin, eh?
Now I’ve got to go out and buy one of those crazy coffee mugs!