1554: A false coiner and a masked dummy 1822: Augustin Joseph Caron, entrapped

1946: Takashi Sakai

September 30th, 2016 Headsman

On this date in 1946, Japan Gen. Takashi Sakai was shot by the World War II Allies at Nanking for war crimes.

Fifty-eight years old at his death, Sakai had built his career in the 1920s and 1930s manning various commands in the occupation of China.

Hours after Japan struck the U.S. at Pearl Harbor, Sakai commenced an attack on Hong Kong, then under British control but defended with only a token force that had no odds against the Japanese.

Sakai’s forces committed numerous summary executions and other cruelties on troops captured from the overwhelmed garrison before Hong Kong finally surrendered on Christmas Day.

The whole operation was much more protracted and difficult than Japan had anticipated and perhaps as a result Sakai was relieved of responsibility for the (similarly brutal) occupation of Hong Kong, and eased into retirement back on the mainland.

His next visit to China would occur under very different circumstances — where he would find himself obliged to dissociate himself from the atrocities that his men had authored in the capture of the city. His war crimes tribunal was not impressed.

The Tribunal dismissed the accused’s plea that he could not be held responsible for the above violations because they were perpetrated by his subordinates and he had no knowledge of them. The Tribunal’s findings were as follows:

That a field Commander must hold himself responsible for the discipline of his subordinates, is an accepted principle. It is inconceivable that he should not have been aware of the acts of atrocities committed by his subordinates … All the evidence goes to show that the defendant knew of the atrocities committed by his subordinates and deliberately let loose savagery upon civilians and prisoners of war.

The principle that a commander is responsible for the discipline of his subordinates, and that consequently he may be held responsible for their criminal acts if he neglects to undertake appropriate measures or knowingly tolerates the perpetration of offences on their part, is a rule generally accepted by nations and their courts of law in the sphere of the laws and customs of war.

(Conversely, Sakai’s attempt to cite superior orders as defense against charges for his part in initiating the war also got short shrift. So in terms of the chain of command, he got it coming and going.)

On this day..

Entry Filed under: 20th Century,Capital Punishment,Death Penalty,Execution,History,Japan,Occupation and Colonialism,Shot,Soldiers,War Crimes

Tags: , , , , , ,

3 thoughts on “1946: Takashi Sakai”

  1. Jay Fix says:

    If you have an email newsletter, please add me.
    Thanks, Jay

    j.fix (at) att (dot) net

  2. Ben says:

    You missed something.

    He was shot. As far as I know, all the Germans executed after the war were hanged – including those officers who specifically requested being shot.

    Do you know why the sentence was different for a Japanese military leader.

    1. Becky says:

      ‘Death by Musketry’ is the penalty that used to be levied for ‘military’ offenses (eg Gen Anton Dostler http://www.executedtoday.com/2009/12/01/1945-anton-dostler-commando-order-fuhrerbefehl/).

      His issuance of the ‘Commando Order’ was considered a military offense rather than ‘Crimes against Humanity’, which were considered to be a ‘civilian’ offenses despite the fact that military officers were found guilty.

      Since his crimes involved the summary execution of prisoners of war (and not mass execution of civilians, for instance), he was sentenced to a martial death by firing squad.

      Have a great day!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


September 2016
« Aug   Oct »



Execution Playing Cards

Exclusively available on this site: our one-of-a-kind custom playing card deck.

Every card features a historical execution from England, France, Germany, or Russia!