Around this time — “sometime between 28 December 2002 and 1 January 2003” — a CIA debriefer questioning Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri at a CIA “black site” in Poland mock-executed his prey.
The Saudi national had been captured in October of 2002 and vanished into the 9/11-mad empire’s dark heart of secret torture dungeons scattered across the globe.
He’d already been renditioned to Afghanistan, and then to Thailand, and then onward (for the events of this post) to a onetime Third Reich base in Poland. In Afghanistan he’d been stripped and hanged up by his shackled hands, his toes barely touching the floor. In Thailand, interrogators waterboarded him and locked him in a coffin.* Graphic videos of his treatment in Thailand, at least, once existed; they are among the evidence destroyed by the CIA in 2005 in its successful project to scotch any public accountability for its torture program.
Nashiri stands accused of the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000, although different intelligence officers characterize him as anything from the “mastermind” to “the dumbest terrorist I ever met.” The only judicial hearing he’s ever had on this matter occurred in abstentia in Yemen in 2004, and resulted in a death sentence. He resides today in America’s forever oubliette at Guantanamo Bay, where a supposed prosecution began in 2011 and has been formally ongoing ever since, mired like all other cases there in the place’s intrinsic juridical incoherence. It seems likely that Nashiri will spend the rest of his days at Guantanamo, his mind a wreck from his ordeals.
One such ordeal, the one qualifying him for consideration by Executed Today, was his feigned execution by handgun and then by power drill — as disclosed by the CIA Inspector General’s report; the quoted excerpt below appears as paragraphs 91 and 92, beginning on page 49 of this pdf. The incident is likewise described in a subsequent Senate Intelligence Committee report, which can be perused here (see p. 98). The name of Nashiri’s mock-executioner is among the many bracketed redactions in this text; it has been publicly reported that the man in question is former CIA and FBI linguist Albert El Gamil.
[ ] interrogation team members, whose purpose it was to interrogate Al-Nashiri and debrief Abu Zubaydah, initially staffed [ ] The interrogation team continued EITs on Al-Nashiri for two weeks in December 2002 [ ] they assessed him to be “compliant.” Subsequently, CTC officers at Headquarters [ ] sent a [ ] senior operations officer (the debrief) [ ] to debrief and assess Al-Nashiri.
[ ]The debrief assessed Al-Nashiri as withholding information, at which point [ ] reinstated [ ] hooding, and handcuffing. Sometime between 28 December 2002 and 1 January 2003, the debriefer used an unloaded semi-automatic handgun as a prop to frighten Al-Nashiri into disclosing information. After discussing this plan with [ ] the debriefer entered the cell where Al-Nashiri sat shackled and racked the handgun once or twice close to Al-Nashiri’s head. On what was probably the same day, the debriefer used a power drill to frighten Al-Nashiri. With [ ] consent, the debriefer entered the detainee’s cell and revved the drill while the detainee stood naked and hooded. The debriefer did not touch Al-Nashiri with the power drill.
Mock execution was not among the menu of torture techniques given legal imprimatur by the Agency, and other interrogators’ protests at his methods led to El Gamil’s removal from the case shortly thereafter.
Sanctioned or no, it is not the only mock execution known to have been inflicted by CIA torturers. Scrolling past seas of black redactions to paragraphs 169-174 of that same Inspector General’s report, we find that
The debriefer who employed the handgun and power drill on Al-Nashiri [ ] advised that those actions were predicated on a technique he had participated in [ ] The debriefer stated that when he was [ ] between September and October 2002, [ ] offered to fire a handgun outside the interrogation room while the debriefer was interviewing a detainee who was thought to be withholding information. [ ] staged the incident, which included screaming and yelling outside the cell by other CIA officers and [ ] guards. When the guards moved the detainee from the interrogation room, they passed a guard who was dressed as a hooded detainee, lying motionless on the ground, and made to appear as if he had been shot to death.
The debriefer claimed he did not think he needed to report this incident because the [ ] had openly discussed this plan [ ] several days prior to and after the incident. When the debriefer was later [ ] and believed he needed a non-traditional technique to induce the detainee to cooperate he told [ ] he wanted to wave a handgun in front of the detainee to scare him. The debriefer said he did not believe he was required to notify Headquarters of this technique, citing the earlier, unreported mock execution [ ].
A senior operations officer [ ] recounted that around September 2002 [ ] heard that the debriefer had staged a mock execution. [ ] was not present but understood it went badly; it was transparently a ruse and no benefit was derived from it. [ ] observed that there is a need to be creative as long as it is not considered torture. [ ] stated that if such a proposal were made now, it would involve a great deal of consultation. It would begin with [ ] management and would include CTC/Legal, [ ] and the CTC.
The [ ] admitted staging a “mock execution” in the first days that [ ] was open. According to the [ ] the technique was his idea but was not effective because it came across as being staged. It was based on the concept, from SERE school, of showing something that looks real, but is not. The [ ] recalled that a particular CTC interrogator later told him about employing a mock execution technique. The [ ] did not know when this incident occurred or if it was successful. He viewed this technique as ineffective because it was not believable.
Four [ ] who were interviewed admitted to either participating in one of the above-described incidents or hearing ab out them. [ ] described staging a mock execution of a detainee. Reportedly, a detainee who witnessed the “body” in the aftermath of the ruse “sang like a bird.”
[ ] revealed that approximately four days before his interview with OIG, the [ ] stated he had conducted a mock execution [ ] in October or November 2002. Reportedly, the firearm was discharged outside of the building, and it was done because the detainee reportedly possessed critical threat information. [ ] stated that he told the [ ] not to do it again. He stated that he has not heard of a similar act occurring [ ] since then.
* Gina Haspel oversaw the Thailand site at the end of 2002, and her countenancing torture against Nashiri and other detainees there made for a passing controversy when Donald Trump appointed her to direct the Agency.
On this day..
White had fatally shotgunned his estranged wife but by now it’ll hardly be remembered beyond the people directly touched by this horror. Yet in its banality this case haas something to tell us about America’s shambolic death penalty system.
Already sure to die in prison via sentences from his 1978 convictions for kidnapping, rape, attempted murder, and robbery,